Zapier vs Make
Last updated: 2026-07-11
Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) are the two most popular no-code automation platforms. Zapier has the largest app ecosystem (7,000+ apps) and is the easiest to use. Make has a more visual, flexible scenario builder that handles complex workflows better. Your choice depends on complexity vs app availability.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | popular Zapier | best Make |
|---|---|---|
| Price from | $0/mo (Free) | $0/mo (Free) |
| Free trial | Free plan available (100 tasks/mo) | Free plan available (1,000 ops/mo) |
| Best for | Connecting apps without code | Visual workflow automation with complex logic |
| Free plan | 100 tasks/mo, 5 Zaps | 1,000 ops/mo, 2 active scenarios |
| Starting paid price | $19.99/mo (Professional) | $9/mo (Core), $16/mo (Pro) |
| App integrations | 7,000+ apps | 1,800+ apps |
| Multi-step Zaps | Professional plan+ | — |
| Conditional logic | Paths (Professional plan+) | Router, filter, error handler |
| Custom code | Python, JavaScript (Professional plan+) | — |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Execution speed | 15 min (Free), 1 min (Pro), instant (Team+) | Variable (plan dependent) |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Support | Community (Free), Email (Pro), Priority (Team+) | Community (Free), Email (Paid) |
| Scenario builder | — | Visual drag-and-drop |
| Data transformation | — | Built-in tools |
Zapier Pros & Cons
Pros
- Largest integration ecosystem — 7,000+ apps
- Visual workflow builder — no code required
- Free plan (100 tasks/mo) for testing and simple automations
- Multi-step Zaps with conditional logic (Paths)
- Excellent documentation and community
Cons
- Expensive at scale — Professional $19.99/mo, Team $69/mo, Company $99/mo
- Free plan limited to 5 Zaps and 100 tasks/mo
- No native API building — can only connect existing apps
- Task-based pricing means complex multi-step Zaps eat through limits fast
- Slower execution on lower tiers (checks every 15 min on Free, every 1 min on Pro+)
Make Pros & Cons
Pros
- More flexible than Zapier for complex, multi-step workflows
- Visual scenario builder shows data flow clearly
- Free plan (1,000 ops/mo) more generous than Zapier
- Handles branching, iteration, error handling, and data transformation
- 1,800+ app integrations
Cons
- Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- Interface can be overwhelming for simple automations
- Fewer app integrations than Zapier (1,800 vs 7,000)
- Core plan $9/mo, Pro $16/mo, Teams $29/mo — pricing can be confusing
- No native integration for some niche apps
Final Verdict
If you need to connect popular apps quickly and simply, Zapier is the easier choice — 7,000+ integrations and a straightforward workflow builder. If you need complex, multi-step workflows with branching, data transformation, and error handling, Make is more powerful and more affordable. For simple automations, Zapier. For complex automations, Make.
Our pick: Zapier (simplicity) / Make (complex workflows)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Make cheaper than Zapier?
Generally yes. Make's free plan (1,000 ops/mo) is more generous than Zapier's (100 tasks/mo). Make's Core plan ($9/mo) is cheaper than Zapier's Professional ($19.99/mo). However, pricing depends on your usage pattern — Zapier charges per task, Make charges per operation.
Which has more app integrations: Zapier or Make?
Zapier has significantly more — 7,000+ apps vs Make's 1,800+. If you need to connect a niche app, Zapier is more likely to support it. Make can connect to any app via HTTP modules and webhooks, but that requires more technical knowledge.
Is Make harder to use than Zapier?
Yes, Make has a steeper learning curve. Its visual scenario builder shows data flow between modules, which is powerful but can be overwhelming. Zapier's linear Zap format is simpler but less flexible. If you're non-technical, start with Zapier.